Should all gay's be flamboyant? I'm not and a lot of my gay friends say i should be more expressive. But that's just doesn't seem to be me.
I'm definitely not. It was a shock to everybody when I came out because I am the complete opposite of flamboyant. I don't think we should have to be flamboyant. I think we should just be ourselves and let the world do what it wants. True friends will accept you for who you are. Never change for somebody else. You just become there tool. You only get one life. Don't waste it being somebody your not. Be yourself and live it how you want to live it. It's so much better that. You have a long beautiful life ahead. Live it to the fullest being yourself, the way it should be spent.
Before entering this thread, three things gave me a shitty first impression:
~ The word is gays. Gay's would be the possessive form for the entirety of gay humans.
~ HAVE. As in, is it necessary that all homosexuals... etc. not haft
~ No stereotyping! It's not fair.
But then I read and now I have this to say:
Personally, I'm not flamboyant but ya know do whatever fits for you. and no stereotyping! D: That'd be like saying I like to eat souls because I'm a ginger. (Because all gingers EAT souls, huh?) When, in fact, I inject the souls I steal.
Linear Mode
