Phuck Buddy wrote:
there are a lot of things that animals do that we don't do. that's the point I was making. we may be animals in certain sense, but we humans > animals.
Except you could use that argument for any animal, such that animal X > other animals.
robb wrote:
All i'm saying, is that being straight is the natural way to be. If being gay was the natural way the population would deplete very quickly.
When people are gay it's because of an inbalance of the hormones they recieved while in the womb.
It's because they receive a different balance of hormones. The 'natural' way is pretty clearly for populations to have a mix of heterosexual and homosexual behaviours. It's not an either-or situation.