Search Results
Search results 61-80 of 324.
-
The picture was a facepalm. Good job making a moot objection. Now, if we can get on with the actual subject matter here, that would be just lovely.
-
Sure. Okay. Any other objections, anyone?
-
kyon_facepalm.jpg Any other objections?
-
Which kind of puts a nail in the coffin of the argument you were making earlier, doesn't it?
-
Quote: “Not quite the end of the world, but mostly 'the end of the world as we know it'. Although it didn't really change the earth. It just killed a bunch of people. Talking more about, an ice age, or the human race developing a sixth sense.” Discovery of the New World, the Internet Boom, Constantine accepting Christianity, the Cold War...? End of the world? Not that 2012 is going to actually be of any significance, but c'mon now.
-
Quote: “Those saying it can't be the end of the world, because not all people would die. Stfu. They don't mean it that way, the end of the world could mean the whole world changes as we know it, whether for the worse or the better.” If that's the case, then the Bubonic Plague, the Deluge (if you're religious), the Holocaust, the Holodomor could all be considered the "end of the world". Yet, here we are.
-
It doesn't sound dumb at all. You should be scared of being wrong, but should welcome the chance to be proven wrong. My beliefs have altered drastically throughout my life due to continually proving myself wrong by objectively looking at the facts. In fact, it's rather intelligent to say that you may be wrong and gives your claims more validity when you actually make them.
-
Mayans You people who think the world is going to end in 2012 probably don't even know why conspiracy theorists derive that from the Mayan Calendar. And you probably don't even understand how their calendar works. If you did, you'd know that the reason for this nonsense is because the Long Count Calendar ends on the thirteenth Bak'tun. That is -- 13.0.0.0.0. Notice that there are absolutely no Kin, Winal, Tun or K'atun? That, by itself, should confirm that they weren't selecting an exact time fo…
-
Re: crossdressing
Ripplemagne - - LGBT
PostYou seem to be under the impression that only professionally trained fighters have the balls to say something to someone. I, personally, don't think it makes him gay if he cross dresses, but I'm a Libertarian. My freedom of speech isn't getting limited. A professionally trained fighter would never hit a normal person though. Pretty much in all circumstances, they're in the wrong and are heavily penalized.
-
Re: crossdressing
Ripplemagne - - LGBT
Post'Cept I'm not talking any kind of shit. I haven't given any of my combative credentials or anything of the sort. All I said is that he's in a lose-lose situation if I did call him gay for cross dressing. Worst that happens to me is that I lose the fight and I get a yacht out of it.
-
Re: crossdressing
Ripplemagne - - LGBT
PostBecause you know me so well, right?
-
Re: crossdressing
Ripplemagne - - LGBT
PostI'd say it if there was some xtuffguix challengedare or some stupid shit like that. Randomly? No. But why would I be scared of him? He hits me and I'm rich. He doesn't hit me and I'm smarter than him -- thus, I verbally thrash him. Win-win situation, tee bee eye.
-
Re: crossdressing
Ripplemagne - - LGBT
PostThen that whole "id luv 2 c them sai 2 heem" thing doesn't mean much, does it?