Search Results
Search results 1-20 of 1,000. There are more results available, please enhance your search parameters.
-
Quote: “Engaging the first group of guys I don't see as a problem. They identified small arms, waited for confirmation and then opened fire. I don't understand opening fire on the mini-van however. I guess justification was that they were also terrorists and they could take back the weapons they saw It's all well and good to armchair everything on youtube when you're sitting at home and aren't in the situation. These guys were right there, saw weapons, thought they were bad guys and professional…
-
Re: Military?
PostQuote: “I aint going into the military but im going in to the marines. couple more days and i take the test.” What the hell? The Marines are a military branch, if you are going into the Marines then you are going into the military. In fact, I'd say you are going more into the military than in any other branch:D
-
They should have no rights whatsoever. I don't understand why people consider the terrorists to be civilians. They are enemy combatants, not civilians. Just because they wear civilian clothes and hide behind civilians when they fight doesn't make them civilians. They are combatants and thus they are prisoners of war when they are captured. It has always been acceptable and legal to indefinitely detain POWs until the end of the war in which they were captured. We have every right to keep them unt…
-
If the suspect in question is an American citizen or resident, then he should be tried according to the Constitution. If the suspect in question is foreign and has never lived in the United States, then the Constitution has nothing to do with him or his situation and he should be detained as a prisoner of war until the end of the war and then tried in a military tribunal.
-
I see what you're saying, but i really don't think we need to surround Iran like that in order to gain an advantage over them. We already have every possible advantage over them both militarily and economically. So I doubt the govt decided to go into two wars just to gain a small advantage over a country that we already have many advantages over.
-
Quote: “Before you guys dance your fingers on your keyboards like drunken monkeys, do us a favor and actually understand what the issue in Afghanistan is about. It's not about terrorism, you fucking retards.” Then what is it about? Since you seem to be so sure of yourself, why don't you offer an explanation of your position?
-
Here are your options- 1. Suck it up and do what you need to do 2. Work at McDonalds for the rest of your life
-
I think the extra troops are a good thing but I don't like how he already planned out our exit strategy because, first of all, the enemy now knows exactly when we're going to withdraw and secondly why the heck are we planning our exit strategy when the war is not even close to being over yet?
-
Quote: “Um, you can go to a military academy and become an officer, and be in charge of people under 21. Seriously learn the rank structure before you try to sound cool. You don't have to be a general or master sergeant to be in charge of people... The point is that how can you justify that someone who you don't deem "mature" enough to drink alcohol is mature enough to fight in war. War is more damaging than alcohol by far.” Yes and you go into a military academy when you're about 18 and get out…