At least 5x faster. o_O
[SIZE="4"]初音ミク[/SIZE]
:3
:3
DamnImGood wrote:
I'm surprised it took you this long. Welcome to the world of standards-acceptance.
DamnImGood wrote:
My buddy installed the beta on his netbook. He said it's noticeably snappier than 3.6.
The post was edited 1 time, last by Steven ().
DamnImGood wrote:
My buddy installed the beta on his netbook. He said it's noticeably snappier than 3.6.
Aleksandr wrote:
Don't worry though, the switch from Google Chrome to Opera will be just as good.
Opera browser | Faster & safer internet | Free download
Esmo wrote:
Okay, so what's better, Firefox or Chrome?
rmg126 wrote:
Firefox has a larger selection of extensions and add-ons, and is said to be more customisable, whereas Chrome's webpage rendering engine is definitely the faster of the two and is also more standards compliant. Basically, if you care what your browser looks like, go with Firefox, if you care about speed and web standards, Chrome is the way to go.
Another option to consider is SRWare Iron, which is essentially Chrome (same source code) but with the "phone-home-to-the-Googleplex-about-your-browsing-habits" component removed.
Steven wrote:
Just build Chromium.
Aleksandr wrote:
The only reason you can give against not using Opera is because it isn't open source. So where does it say open source is better than closed source?