JohnDoe wrote:

I'll tell you why.

MW2 sucks for the same reasons as COD 4 and WaW, just add Commando, Painkiller, and Stopping Power.

Call of Duty 4 sucks because everyone's weapons is better than yours, and there's no lock-on launchers.

Famas with stopping power is debatable the strongest gun in the game under the m16 unless you're a whiney noob that can't aim. It is usually a one burst kill. The ump is VERY VERY over powered for a submachine gun even with a silencer. I use both and they are level 1 guns.

Javelin locks on to people and vehicles.

Commando means they lose the perk of ninja and sound like a rhinobear and I can hear them on the other side of the map

Painkiller is the stupidest death perk. I have rarely ever shot at someone 10 seconds after they spawn. The maps are too big.

Stopping power is great to have in core games. So is coldblooded. And hardline. If you choose to have coldblooded so people can't see you on radar/choppers, then you should be penalized with killing people slower. You shouldn't be able to kill people just as fast and be hidden on rader. I think it's perfect the way it is. Go to hardcore if it annoys you so much.

I'm not commenting on CoD4 and 5 because I don't like them.

CoD4 is among the best shooters of all time. Mainly the reason why it got Game of the Year. And unlike what you're saying, the guns are ridiculously balanced. I played it the other day, the spawns are glorious, and that is enough for me.

JohnDoe wrote:

That is, unless, you get spawn killed in TDM with an enemy AC-130 raining death upon you.

Taking into consideration there is no AC130's in CoD4, that's pretty much impossible.

fuck that shit. COD1:UO was the best COD of all of them hands fucking down.

JohnDoe wrote:

No I mean in MW2 lawl

The cool thing about COD 3 is that there are no knives, just the butt of your gun.

MW2 is trash. CoD3 surely has a fun factor to it, but there is no challenge, no sense of superiority while playing the game. No customization and no legitimate rankings makes it a shallow game.

CoD4 opened a new window, and perfected it. The weapons are balanced, the kill streaks are balanced, the perks are balanced, the entire game is balanced. And like I said, the spawn points are glorious.

JohnDoe wrote:

lol COD1 thats so 2003

now, WaW Final Fronts on the PS2, thats beast

year of production=/=game quality.

JohnDoe wrote:

Only good thing about MW2 is that they finally got the Perks right.

I don't think the perks have been right in any of the games, tbh.

I like CoD4, the only reason I love WaW is the zombies. But, the Call of Duty games like 2 and 3 were great.

JohnDoe wrote:

I'll tell you why.

Call of Duty 3 is awesome since the hit detection is great (you either make it or you don't), and theres no problem with knife detection. There's vehicles, and the maps are fun to explore.

Call of Duty 4 sucks because everyone's weapons is better than yours, and there's no lock-on launchers.

WaW sucks since the knife detection is abysmal (you can never hit anyone with it) and the bullet detection is horrible (GAYwhere 43 and BAR more specifically)

MW2 sucks for the same reasons as COD 4 and WaW, just add Commando, Painkiller, and Stopping Power.

Still making unnecessary trouble, I see.