fumanchu451 wrote:
are u the dirty nazi i used to fight with on this site all the time like along time ago
First, learn to spell.
Second, Neo is not a nazi.
Third, stay on topic please.
fumanchu451 wrote:
are u the dirty nazi i used to fight with on this site all the time like along time ago
fumanchu451 wrote:
i need not spell child this is but an online community where grammer is not the least bit concerned
second he used to be well i calle dhim one anyways and yea he was the dirty nazi i always argued with the kids smart
third nazis deal with america we killed them afterall
fumanchu451 wrote:
i need not spell child this is but an online community where grammer is not the least bit concerned
second he used to be well i calle dhim one anyways and yea he was the dirty nazi i always argued with the kids smart
third nazis deal with america we killed them afterall
Scruff wrote:
Doesn't matter. It costs nothing to type a few extra letters. Furthermore, I doubt you even understand what the word 'Nazi' means.
Lastly, America defeated the Nazis huh? (I'm assuming you mean Nazi germany, since I believe that's the only form of fascism you're aware of) Of course, Britain, France, the USSR, Poland, The British Empire nations and China played no part. Right?
Kuzntskiy wrote:
You can try asking the question and see the reaction of Americans. You can choose to be outraged or have a good laugh, your choice. :p
Most Americans believe the America beat the Nazis, I have experienced their disbelief up-close-and-personal when I said when we were bringing down the Nazis, Americans was watching the game when Japan gave them a run for it by putting their tail (Pearl harbour) on fire. The Japanese kept them busy ever since, US appearing only after we have done the dirty job and Hitler is no more.
American history is one of the worst tripes a person would ever come across in human existence, every good deed in this world since the dawn of America is somehow attributed to Americans. Every bad did they did in this world is always a fault of some 'dictator', of course it is conveniently forgotten who put all those dictators to power in the first place.
Glad that you realised it. Understand is the key to acceptance. You could help the cause, in your own small way, by looking up all those inventions you mentioned and see if it is America which invented them all. The least we can do for these inventors is give due credit to them, not credit everything by hook or crook to an American.
Glad that you realised it. Understand is the key to acceptance. You could help the cause, in your own small way, by looking up all those inventions you mentioned and see if it is America which invented them all. The least we can do for these inventors is give due credit to them, for their service to science and humanity. Not twist every invention in an obvious method to show that it is American.
Vessol wrote:
Yes, unfortanitally many Americans believe that America was the one who saved the world in WW2, while defiantly they helped the Allied powers, they by far were not the sole reason, if that makes sense.
Ignorance is a sad thing :(.
What really gets me though is in any forms of WW2 media, why can you NEVER show the German side of things? I mean, movies, games, everything..
Scruff wrote:
I wouldn't say at the time that the American people viewed themselves as the Heros of the world. The matter of the fact is, America entering the war brough a lot to the table for the British and the Soviets. We couldn't have won without America, and visa versa.
I mean, hell. If we could have frozen Winston Churchill, the coldwar would have ended a lot sooner. Perhaps not with the same results though, hahaha. Good old Winston.
Vessol wrote:
True, even not on the warfront, if not for the vital grain shipments to the USSR, they would have probably been out of the war far earlier.
Winston Churchhill was an amazing man I personally think the UK would probably not have survived WW2 without his guidance., along with Roosevelt, and Stalin...You may ask why I say Stalin, considering many of the things he has done, but you have to admit he was brutal and efficiant in politics.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
The Soviets had repealed resistance when US entered the world war. If the US didn't come into play, we would have won anyway, the different would have been a larger Soviet Union encompassing almost the entire Europe.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
In a period of war, Stalin can't afford to be a Mother Teresa, much like US didn't act like Gandhi. Talking about brutal, even Winston Churchill and Truman can be blamed for the same. 5 million people in India and Burma didn't drop down dead from a 5 year famine.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
Thats a pretty empty statement if you look at facts. I am sorry, but this is as ignorant, false and egoistical as the claim that Americans defeated the Nazis.
- Which other nations fought a quarter of wars America did in the last 50 years?
- Which nation killed a even half of human beings off this earth in the last 50 years?
- Which nation is the only and first one to use nuclear weapons on civilian megapolis cities?
- Which is the first nation to use weapons of mass destruction on civilian habitats?
I have a lot more questions. But they can wait till you answer this four. Nationalism is fine but it shouldn't be at the cost of the live of humans in ever weak nation on the planet. Why is is that in today's world, only Americans look around proudly after they have killed 40 million women, children and the defenceless?
- Which is the nation that caused the largest mass genocide in the last 50 years?
A 500 pound Gorilla be much more noticebale if there is another equally big gorilla and a few slightly smaller gorillas in the room. By the way I am sure, you picked up that one from some media quote. If you care to read it, it is nothing but a manifestation of American self-ego, a gorilla who is blind that he believes there is no other gorilla around.:rolleyes:
Kuzntskiy wrote:
No one really knowsthe exact numbers or even a close estimate of it, it is extremely likely that the number is exaggerated in the Western world just for a propaganda effect. As for avoiding deaths, well, we can always claim even the World War 2 could have been avoided. Only if US did not put such macho and humiliating demands in the Treaty of Versallies, that aroused the German nationalism to firely levels. It is not only the British who have national pride, the Germans or for that matter everyone who can afford it, has it too.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
They bombed the forces again, the few civilians just got on the way. Unlike Vietnam a systematic genocide to eliminate a few tribes with WMDs and starvation wasn't in place by Germans.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
Talking of German bombins in England, we could look a few recent conflicts and see who is ultra-righteous holier-than-thou. Was the Blitzkreig any different from Shock-And-Awe which US and Britian used on Baghdad, Basra, Mazari Sharif and Falluzah? Judge others not, lest ye be judged.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
They bombed the forces again, the few civilians just got on the way. Unlike Vietnam a systematic genocide to eliminate a few tribes with WMDs and starvation wasn't in place by Germans.
Vessol wrote:
Scandaniavia is a region if you didn't know Kuznt.
It includes the nations of: Denmark, Finland, Norway, Iceland, and Sweeden.
Scruff wrote:
What is this heresy Skandinavia isn't even a single country, unless you were being sarcastic. In which case damn you to hell.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
Okay Vessol, here are some pointers for you.
- When you move to Finland or Denmark, don't cry out in marketplaces "Is there anybody speaking English?"
A discussion about Scandinavia between two people who can't even spell the region's name correctly and one who doesn't seem to realise how many people in Denmark speak near-fluent English. That was fun
- Definitely no American expletives, most Danish and Finnish do understand American profanities even if they don't speak English.[/quote]
If you're going to use the word "America" to refer the the United States of America then I don't see the big deal with referring to Scandinavia as a single entity anyway. "America" isn't a country either.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
For the person who spells scandinavia differently I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill. That is stupid really, for someone to argue how something is spelled, much like the argument between spelling 'realise' or 'realize'. But of course, we can expect only so much from someone who is perpetually busy to finding small things so that they can insult others. The ambiguity and languages and way of spelling often escapes their notice. Iff they were a little more wise....
Kuzntskiy wrote:
The second part, Danes speaking English is interesting. English is still a foreign language to most Danes and advising most Americans not to shout "How many of you speak English?" is still a good idea. If one were to go into the more local markets of Copenhagen, one starts to appreciate the fact that English doesn't always help in a country where it is a foreign language.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
And there is always Greenland, English is spoken only among the few and far between.
Kuzntskiy wrote:
If one says America to mean the country United States of America, what country would the term Scandinavia mean? I hope the man with the great wisdom can explain it all....