Megatron wrote:
I got Windows and I'm proud of it.
So am I. Though I would like a Mac, though I think MS Office for Mac sucks. The Windows version for it is better (and I like right-click).
Megatron wrote:
I got Windows and I'm proud of it.
Teenbay wrote:
Can a windows machine handle 5000 users at the same time like linux?
mr.h wrote:
Linux is a million times better (and faster) under-the-hood than windows and people who use it don't typically need advanced, professional programs. But for those who do, windows works well enough. Just be sure not to run more than two programs at once (unless you have a 400 ghz CPU with 20 cores), because in my experience it will take you a year to get anything done.
Teenbay wrote:
Can a windows machine handle 5000 users at the same time like linux?
Striker88;1062839033 wrote:
You know why nobody has gotten evidence? God hasn't allowed that and won't.
DamnImGood wrote:
If you want to make your computer faster, you get an SSD. It's really that simple. I also run a dozen applications at a time without any slowdown or issues. Windows 7 is also pretty versatile on the hardware that it can be run on. I've put it on some pretty low-end netbooks and was surprised it performed better than XP (the OS that came on it).
Please take your exaggerations elsewhere.
Windows Server 2008 R2 probably can.
Teenbay wrote:
Let me guess.
Gonna shoot in the dark with this one.
You are not a server admin are you?
Teenbay wrote:
Let me guess.
Gonna shoot in the dark with this one.
You are not a server admin are you?
mr.h wrote:
Just be sure not to run more than two programs at once (unless you have a 400 ghz CPU with 20 cores), because in my experience it will take you a year to get anything done.
Tombgeek wrote:
So am I. Though I would like a Mac, though I think MS Office for Mac sucks. The Windows version for it is better (and I like right-click).
Calvin wrote:
If you want right-click, just enable secondary click in System Preferences.