Hello,
My name is Daniel, I'm from Spain (so I'm sorry for any gramatical mistake you could find here; I'm actually studying English by my own) and I just came here because I would like to express my opinion about a 'forbidden' ideology, or rather, a movement, nowadays: the Nationalsocialism.
We all know, and we even find it obvious, that the History has been always written by the winners. And not only that; winners stay in the power and for this reason, they can also control all the machinery that influenciates, or that helps to influenciate, the public opinion about things.
Because, let's do a pair of simple reflections; the first one is: what happens if you dare to say in public that you are a Nationalsocialist (NS) follower? You will get most probably kicked out of your group of friends, labelled as a monster by your contacts and pursued by society.
But what happens if, instead, you say that you are a follower of the hammer and sickle's doctrine, which was used for killing about the triple more of people than NS did? And is it a coincidence that nowadays this ideology is labelled as 'solidary' while the comunists won the WW2, versus Germany?
Who does know about (really) Hitler's thoughts? It's not about reading the mind of nobody, but to search for the original sources: in the same way you don't judge Karl Marx by reading only references to him coming from persons related to Nationalsocialism, it's the same big error the fact of judging the Nationalsocialism by reading only (or worse, by hearing) references to it coming from comunists or people related to similar movements, or just from ignorants who have converted to theirselves a lie into a truth by hearing them thousands times.
I would invite you to go to a library and to read the 'Mein Kampf' if it was not for the fact that, if the book is not already forbidden, you would be near of being kicked out from there and labelled with the worst adjectives. But in the other hand, if you look up for 'The Communist Manifesto', you are an "intellectual" and the staff of there would even help you to find it. Fortunately, if you search for it through the Internet and release yourself of the new fascists prejudices inculcated to you since you were a child (like, for example, the fact that you have to allow the ethnocide and the destruction of your culture and your origins by accepting the inmigrant invasion. But, of course, they don't tell it to you in this way, but just using beautiful words, like "no racism" or "we all are brothers". But I wonder until where arrives this fraternity when in a country whose black population is 12%, the 50% of total crimes and rapes are commited by them), and you read it carefully, you will find out the same as the author of 'Mein Kampf' (I avoid to spell his name because the legend says that if nowadays you dare to do it three times in a day, a trapdoor opens under your feet) in his moment: Europe's roots are being slowly destroyed by external interested people. The problem is the same, it only changes the context and some of our current enemies (which most of them, of course, are not introduced to we in this way, but just as negotiators, or, even worse, our comrades. Saudi Arabia is an example of a well-covered Europe's enemy. China is the an other example. But they have money. They doesn't seem like beggars, like Al-Qaeda terrorists. They smile to us. So no problem, right?
I won't delve here in Hitler's ideology because for that job I earnestly recommend you to read the Mein Kampf, the original source (and to analize carefully every paragraph you read). However, I can advance you that if you try to leave aside some deep prejudices inculcated to you, you will even find crudely logic some facts, like for example that if it woildn't have been because of the massive executions of indian tribes in America (which were clearly inferior than us in all senses: just try to explain why North-America, which descend from Europe, is much evolved rather than South-America, which most of its population doesn't descend from europeans), a lot of advances, or rather, technological and ideological contributions of the world wouldn't came off.
Yes, it's crude. But would you honestly change the History in order to avoid the English colonizers "ethnic cleansing" 500 years ago? Because if you wouldn't, then you are already supporting another hypothetical ethnic cleansing in, let's say, for example, Africa: another (social, technological and cultural) worthless continent but the richest in natural resources, resources that would be well-used by Europeans for maintaining its own supervivence and its development.
Again: I'm being crude? Cruel maybe? Can be, but also the Nature is cruel (nobody cares when a lyon starts to eat an alive gazelle: we all just accept that, in the Nature, the strongest is who survives).
Why should we keep on maintaining Africa "alive" by sending money and food? For dragging out their death throes? Is not that really cruel? Or we are just prolonging their suffering just for cleansing our own conscience? More: what africans really bring to us apart of crimes in our own countries?
Maybe at this point the most of brainwashed people prefer to avoid these questions and start to scream at me "nazi".
We talk about years of indoctrination, but I would just recommend to these people to release their learnings (I say 'learnings' because meanwhile they think that their ideas come from nowhere, or maybe from a supposed common sense, they are really consequences of their primarly indoctrinations) and try to start to think for themselves. Forget for a moment your feelings and your inculcated prejudices and just analize the European's ethnological (and, consequently, its social and cultural) situation.
Our race (another forbidden word by the generalized political correctness) will disappear because of our indolence. But the wors thing is that we are forced to be like this since we are children. Is not that really cruel?
Yes, races does exist. And we must protect ours. Because we, the Europeans, are really unique.
Thank you indeed for the patience you had for reading me until here.
My name is Daniel, I'm from Spain (so I'm sorry for any gramatical mistake you could find here; I'm actually studying English by my own) and I just came here because I would like to express my opinion about a 'forbidden' ideology, or rather, a movement, nowadays: the Nationalsocialism.
We all know, and we even find it obvious, that the History has been always written by the winners. And not only that; winners stay in the power and for this reason, they can also control all the machinery that influenciates, or that helps to influenciate, the public opinion about things.
Because, let's do a pair of simple reflections; the first one is: what happens if you dare to say in public that you are a Nationalsocialist (NS) follower? You will get most probably kicked out of your group of friends, labelled as a monster by your contacts and pursued by society.
But what happens if, instead, you say that you are a follower of the hammer and sickle's doctrine, which was used for killing about the triple more of people than NS did? And is it a coincidence that nowadays this ideology is labelled as 'solidary' while the comunists won the WW2, versus Germany?
Who does know about (really) Hitler's thoughts? It's not about reading the mind of nobody, but to search for the original sources: in the same way you don't judge Karl Marx by reading only references to him coming from persons related to Nationalsocialism, it's the same big error the fact of judging the Nationalsocialism by reading only (or worse, by hearing) references to it coming from comunists or people related to similar movements, or just from ignorants who have converted to theirselves a lie into a truth by hearing them thousands times.
I would invite you to go to a library and to read the 'Mein Kampf' if it was not for the fact that, if the book is not already forbidden, you would be near of being kicked out from there and labelled with the worst adjectives. But in the other hand, if you look up for 'The Communist Manifesto', you are an "intellectual" and the staff of there would even help you to find it. Fortunately, if you search for it through the Internet and release yourself of the new fascists prejudices inculcated to you since you were a child (like, for example, the fact that you have to allow the ethnocide and the destruction of your culture and your origins by accepting the inmigrant invasion. But, of course, they don't tell it to you in this way, but just using beautiful words, like "no racism" or "we all are brothers". But I wonder until where arrives this fraternity when in a country whose black population is 12%, the 50% of total crimes and rapes are commited by them), and you read it carefully, you will find out the same as the author of 'Mein Kampf' (I avoid to spell his name because the legend says that if nowadays you dare to do it three times in a day, a trapdoor opens under your feet) in his moment: Europe's roots are being slowly destroyed by external interested people. The problem is the same, it only changes the context and some of our current enemies (which most of them, of course, are not introduced to we in this way, but just as negotiators, or, even worse, our comrades. Saudi Arabia is an example of a well-covered Europe's enemy. China is the an other example. But they have money. They doesn't seem like beggars, like Al-Qaeda terrorists. They smile to us. So no problem, right?
I won't delve here in Hitler's ideology because for that job I earnestly recommend you to read the Mein Kampf, the original source (and to analize carefully every paragraph you read). However, I can advance you that if you try to leave aside some deep prejudices inculcated to you, you will even find crudely logic some facts, like for example that if it woildn't have been because of the massive executions of indian tribes in America (which were clearly inferior than us in all senses: just try to explain why North-America, which descend from Europe, is much evolved rather than South-America, which most of its population doesn't descend from europeans), a lot of advances, or rather, technological and ideological contributions of the world wouldn't came off.
Yes, it's crude. But would you honestly change the History in order to avoid the English colonizers "ethnic cleansing" 500 years ago? Because if you wouldn't, then you are already supporting another hypothetical ethnic cleansing in, let's say, for example, Africa: another (social, technological and cultural) worthless continent but the richest in natural resources, resources that would be well-used by Europeans for maintaining its own supervivence and its development.
Again: I'm being crude? Cruel maybe? Can be, but also the Nature is cruel (nobody cares when a lyon starts to eat an alive gazelle: we all just accept that, in the Nature, the strongest is who survives).
Why should we keep on maintaining Africa "alive" by sending money and food? For dragging out their death throes? Is not that really cruel? Or we are just prolonging their suffering just for cleansing our own conscience? More: what africans really bring to us apart of crimes in our own countries?
Maybe at this point the most of brainwashed people prefer to avoid these questions and start to scream at me "nazi".
We talk about years of indoctrination, but I would just recommend to these people to release their learnings (I say 'learnings' because meanwhile they think that their ideas come from nowhere, or maybe from a supposed common sense, they are really consequences of their primarly indoctrinations) and try to start to think for themselves. Forget for a moment your feelings and your inculcated prejudices and just analize the European's ethnological (and, consequently, its social and cultural) situation.
Our race (another forbidden word by the generalized political correctness) will disappear because of our indolence. But the wors thing is that we are forced to be like this since we are children. Is not that really cruel?
Yes, races does exist. And we must protect ours. Because we, the Europeans, are really unique.
Thank you indeed for the patience you had for reading me until here.
