Are there any people who don't smoke weed, but think it should be legal?

    • Are there any people who don't smoke weed, but think it should be legal?

      It would be interesting if there were, because everyone I know who doesn't smoke it (such as myself) is against it. I think it's another social sickness and a one-sided issue that is being touted as an issue of progress by the media. It's bad enough we have alcohol, tobacco and all of those pills. All the arguments I've read or heard for making marijuana legal were from people who smoked it.
    • Re: Are there any people who don't smoke weed, but think it should be legal?

      I don't smoke it, I think it should be legal, but only for medical purposes, because weed can really help people, but not in its standard form (cut into pieces), but as an oil. I don't think it should be legal in its normal form for everyday use because we already have alcohol and tobacoo, and a lot of people highly consumate these in early teenage years, so if we add weed, things are just going to get worse. That is my opinion.
    • Re: Are there any people who don't smoke weed, but think it should be legal?

      I don't smoke weed, I have, my older brother got me hi a few times, but I didnt like it
      But I think it should be legal, I think there should be an age limit like alcohol or tobacco.
      They cause way mor physical damage to people's health and families

      We've all seen that...
    • theCster wrote:

      it should be legal. the only reason it wasn't was because the government didn't get their cut. It's medicinal, calming and non-addictibe. you can't say that for some legal drugs. I don't smoke, but if tobacco is legal, why shouldn't kush be?
      To be fair- this part isn't true.

      I think the potential revenue for states and America as a whole are insanely beneficial. Look at Colorado- they tax the SHIT out of weed, and now they've made so much money from it that they'll actually have to start giving it back to the state in some way. Not including the millions they've already given back to schools (Source: huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/17/…na-schools_n_6888444.html). If every state had that revenue, I could only imagine what would change.




      “We've all got both light and dark inside us. What matters is the part we choose to act on. That's who we really are.”
      -J.K. Rowling
    • Linda wrote:

      If every state had that revenue, I could only imagine what would change.


      Yepp. In my opinion the only thing that's pro legalization is that people smoke weed and stuff anyway, whether it is legal or illegal and flushes some extra money of taxes in the coffers of the State as a side effect of legalization or so.

      But every state can drag the money in very diverse ways from the citizen's pockets, eg to fund or promote schools, without legalizing those stuff. Basically, I see in this legalization thing nothing more as propaganda.

      Also all the products that people don't really need to survive could in a similar manner be taxed - eg all fast food, any form of stimulants (chocolate, alcohol, delicatessen) or expensive equipment ... cars with unnecessary fuel consumption and size, designer clothes, big homescreens etc etc etc ( I guess, it's a endless list).

      I think, on this level, it could be done a lot more money to finance and raise social issues to the level of economic prosperity. Well, in the end it's always all about a balance of this two poles.

      But this balance will probably never be achieved as long as we have a pure civilization of commercialism and consumerism.