Uncut here
cut or uncut
-
-
uncut
can cover most of the head when hard -
kmcd wrote:
At the least, it's certainly weird that it's the only time society removes a healthy body part for no medical reason. (When people say it's cleaner, it is...kind of. There is a very diminished UTI rate in the first year, but I had a higher UTI rate than any boy in my first year. Besides, we have condoms for safe sex and showers for cleaning.)
We don't remove the appendix just because it could burst. If breast cancer runs in the family, we wouldn't remove our daughter's breast buds.
Mutilation is defined as:
The act of mutilating, or the state of being mutilated; deprivation of a necessary or important part, as a limb.
The act of mutilating, or the state of being mutilated; deprivation of a limb or of an essential part.
The act of mutilating or the state of being mutilated.
an injury that causes disfigurement or that deprives you of a limb or other important body part.
It's not really a stretch, IMO, but like I said, it's certainly weird it's the only healthy body part to be removed at birth...and it's the vast minority of the world (and even in the USA it's under 50%.)
I do wonder though something about guys. You've obviously seen many of your friends naked. Have you seen them all? I wonder how many friends (with and without foreskin) opt to change in private rooms for sleepovers, wrap in towels in locker rooms, etc...
Like if there's a group of 10 friends in the locker room at the pool, are they all going to change at a bench without a towel? I'm sure cut *and* whole kids opt for additional privacy for various reasons, but I can certainly understand if those 2-3 whole kids opt for additional privacy measures.
Sean2001 wrote:
Gabraham247 wrote:
Nah, mutilation is still a stretch imo. We do body modifications to a bunch of areas.
Seeing it as cosmetic, like a boob job or even like a tattoo or getting your tongue pierced, seems quite sensible and I am quite happy for people to make those kinds of choice about their bodies. I don't react badly or criticise anyone for having those things done, though depending on what it is, I might privately consider that it is not an improvement to my subjective idea of beauty.
On the other hand, in the same way we would not tattoo baby boys before they are old enough to decide for themselves whether they want to display that particular piece of art on their bodies, so I also believe we should refrain from cutting something off them until they are old enough to decide whether they want it there or not.
Again it is just a little piece of skin.
I'm circumsized and my dick works just fine
Its not like cutting a full organ or member
But again I dont have a problem with people who dont want to do it or to their children, I sure respect that -
You think it works fine because that's all you know. If my thumb was removed at birth, I might go around saying my hand worked fine.
-
kmcd wrote:
You think it works fine because that's all you know. If my thumb was removed at birth, I might go around saying my hand worked fine.
-
JonSon wrote:
I am very uncut
-
Cut here, like most boys I know
-
I am cut
-
Uncut and love it. My foreskin covers the head when I'm hard till I pull it back. The dr told me I have excessive foreskin. Like my dadSomewhat hyper
-
Uncut, and it covers the entire head when I'm soft
-
cut, with foreskin envy LOL
-
Uncut. My foreskin almost completely covers my head.
-
I'm cut
-
Cut and love it. I like the look of my head and my incision is kinda cute, what's there of it.
-
uncutI am very friendly, very curious, Just want to chill out most of time
-
helmet or anteater?
helmet here. -
I'm partially cut like the extra flappy skin got removed but I still have my foreskin over the head just not any extra flappy skin
-
I m uncut
-
im cut unfortunately
-
theletters wrote:
im cut unfortunately
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Similar Threads