which you have to pay for yearly.
playstation 3 or xbox 360?
-
-
Dualnames wrote:
3rd gen Xbox 360 games vs. 1st gen PS3 games, yea thats a GREAT comparison. PS3 is now a year old and its so powerfull they can't even use the full capability of the beast. Why don't you learn something before you try to back yourself up.
BTW the online play is not better, may be more people but how would it be better? It can't be faster because that is dependent on YOUR internet speed.
Actually, XBox Live is better. It has around 5 years experinace of being online. Sony hasn't. Just because you have to pay for it doesn't mean it's shit. It means that you actually are paying for something decent and that is reagulary updated. Sony made a mistake making PSN free because sure they may have more money but they can't keep making it free cause they will loose money.
XBL v PSN..... Well, Sure PSN maybe FREE... But that's just shows how desperate you want to be online. XBL on the other hand, like I said has 5 years of experiance so it has alot more members, Yes. But also it has awesome support service.
I should know...Plus the fact the 360 is more, how should I put it.. "Not made out of paper shit" The PS2 was and the PS3 maybe.. Unless they were wise to update it.
moto4life wrote:
The reason that i am pretty sure that sony has much more money to just spend as they want is because sony is the company that you have to use because it is everywhere. Believe me, sony as a corporation, with Sony Records (which is huge), LionsGate and their 12 other movie studios (which are huge), Ericson, Playstation, PC devision, and owning one of the most widely recognized words in the world, WalkMan, they have more money than at least Microsoft and Apple combined, maybe not google, but i think they do.
update:
Sony revenue- $77,640,205,020.00
google- 16,500,000,000.00
Apple-$24,000,000,000.00
Microsoft-$51,000,000,000.00
Yea i was wrong at first, they only have as much money as apple and microsoft, not all three
yes, this is totally irrelevant.
You ever heard of Bill Gates? He has like around $50 billion... And that's him alone... And let's see.. hen there is his company.. I'm pretty sure MS has the most.
(I haven't really done much research on who is rich but if you wanna battle about it I will find out) -
yeah and i suppose the ring of death is a nice feature too.
-
no?
The post was edited 1 time, last by username #90 ().
-
ps3
-
thank you.
-
The RoD is old now. Like any new console on the market there will be bad features at release and further on for a while... It barely exsist anymore UNLESS you don't freakin look after it.. THat's why people get the damn thing, learn to respect a objest and you may get good use out of it -_-
-
Still ps3. Also how can you say not much members theres enough to fill cod4 servers 24/7
-
There's enough to fill CoD4 servers.. xD
That's nothing.. Has the PS3 like got any other servers that fill up on all their other games ACCEPT CoD4.. I think not, Not as much as the 360. -
I'd got for the PS3 because, 1) 10 Year life spane 2) Pure Processing power 3) Ease of the XMB 4) The PlayStation Network is ballin' 5) Home 6) All th new and EXCLUSIVE games we are getting coming 2008 (MGS4, LittleBigPlanet, Haze, KillZone2)Add me on AIM: Omygoditstaylor
-
xbox 360 ftw
-
XBOX's Are shit..
how could anyof you think they are good they werre built with lights on the front telling you about errors.. they shouldnt break. 360''s break all the time ps3's hardlyever
thats an inconvinience also ps3 though the console is cheaper.. online play is free and has quite alot of people to play wiht...
xbox's online is £40 a year over 5 years or so.. xbox has cost much much much more than a ps3.[SIZE=3]BOW DOWN
[/SIZE] -
olg1905 wrote:
XBOX's Are shit..
how could anyof you think they are good they werre built with lights on the front telling you about errors.. they shouldnt break. 360''s break all the time ps3's hardlyever
thats an inconvinience also ps3 though the console is cheaper.. online play is free and has quite alot of people to play wiht...
xbox's online is £40 a year over 5 years or so.. xbox has cost much much much more than a ps3.
Since when was a PS3 cheaper than a 360. According to my records the PS3 is £100 more then the 360... And yeah I get your point the PS3 has only been out barely a month and it has more player than the 360
I think not.And there's a reason why we pay. We pay for quality, when live goes down..Which it has due to too many people they can eaily upgrade with the money we give them. Sony on the other hand make live free so they have to pull shares out of another product to upgrade their online.
And I highly doubt the 360 costs much much much much more than the PS3:rolleyes:
The New York Times wrote:
The PS3, which was introduced in North America on Friday with a hefty $599 price tag for the top version, certainly delivers gorgeous graphics. But they are not discernibly prettier than the Xbox 360's. More important, the whole PlayStation 3 system is surprisingly clunky to use and simply does not provide many basic functions that users have come to expect, especially online.
The whole light system at the front isn't just for errors. You get errors on the damn screen too. And the reason WHY the 360 failed fequently close to launch was because they rushed it which in a way has given the 360 a bad image, but it's been fixed and barely does it.
Think of this way, If someone gets say.. 3 red lights on the right they google it.. Bingo you know what it is.. Simple. No stupid codes..
Actually, Think of this way the PS3 will have it's errors. I know the PS2 did, why shouldn't the PS3; Infact anything will have errors. -
Am I the only one still stuck on ps1 and snes??
-
Yes
-
waaah simply said:
xbox360 16% failure rate with Red ring of Death vs. ps3 3% Yellow ring of Death -
redhunter1989 wrote:
waaah simply said:
xbox360 16% failure rate with Red ring of Death vs. ps3 3% Yellow ring of Death
Simple, Aye.
But everyone makes mistakes, and from mistakes people learn and and advance their knowledge more better. Soo Yeah.. -
They should mix to make something like a pbox? or a XS <--- Dont like that um... think ppl think
-
No. just know
-
No. just no
-
Share
- Facebook 0
- Twitter 0
- Google Plus 0
- Reddit 0
-
Tags