i'm 15, and i'm pregnant.
i don't even know who the father is.
i've basically thrown my life down the drain.
this sucks.
i don't even know who the father is.
i've basically thrown my life down the drain.
this sucks.
deaditefuckgirl wrote:
Abortions make the world a better place.
*zeni* wrote:
No they DO NOT!!! How does killing an innocent child make this already evil world "better"???
godless_musician wrote:
There are two words in your sentence that are utterly wrong.
1. Innocent. A rock is not innocent. Grass is not innocent. You can't "sin" against them. They haven't done anything to be guilty or innocent of. A foetus has not done anything and is not innocent.
2. Child. A foetus is not a child. It may or may not become a child. It's alive, but it can barely be called human. It's a parasite that may or may not become a human.
Only blind faith calls a foetus an "innocent child" that deserves a pseudo-life at its mother's expense.
*zeni* wrote:
No they DO NOT!!! How does killing an innocent child make this already evil world "better"???
Alsou wrote:
yea i wanna ask the same question! that's evil!
here is what abortion does:
sibbyonline.blogs.com/sibbyonline/images/abortion2201.jpeg
oh man this is nasty!
godless_musician wrote:
A gross picture doesn't mean anything. You can't ban anything that disturbs you emotionally. You have to put it to a rational test.
godless_musician wrote:
A gross picture doesn't mean anything. You can't ban anything that disturbs you emotionally. You have to put it to a rational test.
Saved-by-Grace wrote:
So that picture wasn't a human? And it wasn't dead?
So it wasn't a murdered human? (Also known as... abortion?)
godless_musician wrote:
I made that clear. No, it is not a human. It is a *potential* human. (I guess it is a human only in the sense that it has human DNA--but because it's a physical parasite on it's mother it--not the mother--is the second-class citizen.)
It seems pro-lifers are very loose with the word "murder" as well.
godless_musician wrote:
I made that clear. No, it is not a human. It is a *potential* human. (I guess it is a human only in the sense that it has human DNA--but because it's a physical parasite on it's mother it--not the mother--is the second-class citizen.)
It seems pro-lifers are very loose with the word "murder" as well.
Saved-by-Grace wrote:
Are you blind? That creature had a head, a face, arms, legs, hands, fingers, and toes.
Just so you know, it had a brain and heart too.
A beating heart at one point.
It was indeed a human.
Uh, no. Pro-lifers just want the innocent to live.
But since something that has eyes, senses, a heart, and body doesn't talk with million-dollar words, it's about as alive and innocent to you as a rock or grass.
How sad.