[SIZE=3][CENTER]I don’t suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
[/CENTER]
[/SIZE]
[/CENTER]
[/SIZE]
Don'tClickHere wrote:
For example... Have you ever shaved?
Neal wrote:
What's that got to do with anything?
John195 wrote:
for those of you who say its natural because its been around for thousands of years, that makes no sense. clothes have been around for millions of years, but theyre not natural. do you see clothes growing on trees or babies being born with clothes on? no. just because people are gay, doesnt mean its natural, but its not bad either
NOT BASHING GAYS
John195 wrote:
for those of you who say its natural because its been around for thousands of years, that makes no sense. clothes have been around for millions of years, but theyre not natural. do you see clothes growing on trees or babies being born with clothes on? no. just because people are gay, doesnt mean its natural, but its not bad either
NOT BASHING GAYS
Stefi_Cutie63 wrote:
Well I dnt think it's natural...cuz lyk ppl were meant 2 u kno reproduce and a guy and a guy cant do that..same as a gurl and a gurl cant either...so it is acceptable and I'm not a homophobe. (I have a lot of bisexual friends)...I just dnt think u could call it natural...
Ammon wrote:
Two women can reproduce, actually.
Ammon wrote:
First of all, they can go through artificial insemination. One might say that still requires a male, but the male doesn't need to be in relationship for it to happen.
Second of all, like S1 said, they haven't done it with humans yet, but they are working on making it possible to create a baby by combining the nucleus of two eggs.
5cent92 wrote:
I dont think they should do that unless the baby agrees.
DamnImGood wrote:
That's not two females reproducing; that's one female reproducing with the assistance of a male. The relationship part has nothing to do with it.
Parthenogenesis is something that's far away for humans, if possible at all.
And it goes without saying that anything done in a lab is definitely not natural, so I don't see how artificially getting two female humans to reproduce can be used as an argument that homosexuality is natural.
Red Roses wrote:
I think it's natural - homosexuality is caused by an imbalance of hormones in the uterus when the fetus is developing, and causes something (I can't really remember, it's a certain gland or part of the brain or something) to not develop properly or to the right size. So you can't help being homosexual or not.
penguin10916 wrote:
Joemoe93: little kids are like sponges. what I mean is that they are able to retain things better at that age then we can. So for example: lets say that we have this family of 1 mom, 2 girls and a boy. And lets say that the mom pays more attention to the girls or at least in the boy's mind she does. because children like attention, the boy is going to start acting like his sisters. Now another thing that could affect a child is if they are around other boys and for some odd reason they're naked... may sound odd but happens quite often. Eventually they are going to be shaped by that. and in the bad case, they could've been raped by a guy older then he which could make him think that its normal and that its right.