Njord wrote:

Well there are some 5 year olds that are fine with 40 year old men. But I guess that's fine huh?

Dude, at 18, you shouldn't even be dating under 17, whether those girls think they're mature or not, because 10 times out of 10 they arent.

Second, you're off to college, or at least the professional workforce, and no grown ass man should be dating kids at that point in his life. I have a dozen+ girls I [that] want the fuck the living shit of [me] at my school, but since most of them are >17, it's not going to happen. Get some fucking standards and get a real woman.

Tony32 wrote:

I dont mean like 40 years apart.... -_-

more like as long ur both teens duh... <_<

Njord wrote:

Well there are some 5 year olds that are fine with 40 year old men. But I guess that's fine huh?

Njord wrote:

Dude, at 18, you shouldn't even be dating under 17, whether those girls think they're mature or not, because 10 times out of 10 they arent.

Njord wrote:

Second, you're off to college, or at least the professional workforce, and no grown ass man should be dating kids at that point in his life. I have a dozen+ girls I [that] want the fuck the living shit of [me] at my school, but since most of them are >17, it's not going to happen. Get some fucking standards and get a real woman.

matthew21 wrote:

Let me throw that last word back out at you in response to your profound remark above: HUH???
That remark was confusing(and a response to tony32 about age gap), I think he means that 5 year olds are comfortable being around 40 years olds, and Visa Versa. Not meaning anything sexually, but since they are comfortable around each other, why not let them date each other? (It's fucking disgusting and creepy is why but that's beside the point.)

Most girls at 17 are far more mature than 18 year old guys. There's a good biological reason for that which can be traced all the way back through human evolution. I suggest you read up on it - assuming you can read and reason... simultaneously.
Physiological and psychological maturity are completely different things. Just because a woman will hit puberty before a man doesn't mean she's any more mentally mature than him, there would be no way to scientifically prove that anyways because every individual, whether male or female, developes mental/emotional maturity at an individual pace. I know mature 16 year olds and immature 20 year olds, age and phyisical maturity do not equate emotional maturity.

Pray tell what exactly is a "grown ass man?" (you fall in the category so go look in a mirror if you need a reference.) Would you describe yourself as one now or in your future? Well, I would, if it's a man who's ass has grown to full-bearded maturity while his brain has deteriorated into fecal matter... Most people who reach the age of 13 or 14 are generally referred to as "adolescents," not "kids"; at least most deserve such respect.Yes, technically a 13 year old is an adolescent, but they are definitely reffered to as kids a lot more than adolecents. 16, 17 and 18 year olds are often referred to as kids too. Unless of course unless you're referring to young billy goats... perhaps you have had some dates with kids of that sort yourself?

Sorry Njord, but I'm unable to comment rationally on the remainder of your vitriolic, nonsensical vituperation (your senseless ranting)The same could be said about what you've written. Well, one last minor mathematical point: the sign ">" means "greater than"; did you mean "less than," which is correctly indicated by the symbol "<" ? :rolleyes:

Ok. I'm sorry. I'm just really in a sarcastic mood this evening. :D

Njord wrote:

Dude, at 18, you shouldn't even be dating under 17, whether those girls think they're mature or not, because 10 times out of 10 they arent.

matthew21 wrote:

Most girls at 17 are far more mature than 18 year old guys. There's a good biological reason for that which can be traced all the way back through human evolution. I suggest you read up on it - assuming you can read and reason... simultaneously.