gookiecookie wrote:

i doubt he can just stop whenever, a PL usually lives life this way to the end, its a constant game of sniper on the tower, they run from place to place lieing and cloaking themselves...

eaither they mature enough to let go of the habbit, or carry on forever doing it.

remember, lies don't get you out of a problem, it just sinks u in deeper and deeper.

gookiecookie wrote:

i doubt he can just stop whenever,

Kase wrote:

But there'll come a time in the future where you'll lose control of your lying ability, and once that happens everything will spin out of control. If people realize it, it won't bode well for you in a team environment or in the workplace.

Zebra wrote:

It's not as much of a boomerang, as you think love. xP

I can only imagine, the people that you all know who do this in real life, must be very bad at what they do.

Kase wrote:

Are you so confident in yourself?

DeamonD wrote:

There is your problem right there. You over estimate your abilities. There is always someone better than you, there is always someone who can crack you, and once that happens, all hell will break loose.
Being so confident in your self is the worst thing you can do.

gookiecookie wrote:

yhea actually lies can get u out, but they can always come back to bite ur ass.

she lied, i belived, then she changed the story, and i bit her in the ass with her lie.

its on email too, one of the stupid places to lie because it leaves a trail

Kase wrote:

Are you so confident in yourself?



And I really can't think of love as a boomerang, of all things. Unless you take things to the extreme.

Kase wrote:

You'll know when you experience it. Which you might.

And if you don't, I'll count you very lucky and you can come be my mentor.

Zebra wrote:

People, can never truly know what's inside your mind love. Besides, I don't have a problem.

DeamonD wrote:

*sigh*
Look, this coming from a person who claims to manipulate and "foresee" things when he lies.....is again a contradiction within its' self. To predict how a person will react. you need to understand the human mind, to understand the human mind you will need to know how it functions and hence what is inside of it....

I do not claim to know people inside-out, however I have been "around" and I am much better predicting and telling what is inside someone (no, don't ask me to tell you what is inside you). It is far easier than you claim, but it is a little harder than it seems.

Zebra wrote:

Why be such an asshole? You only know me online, I have nothing I can or will prove to you. You need to pay attention to the finer things, like the details. I claim only that I study the people around me immensely, and that I beleive I have a good idea of what they do and think. They could be thinking the exact opposite, for all I would know. I wouldn't pose such a pretentious absolute.

I can't agree with you that you're so perceptive either, as you like to claim people who lie only seek "attention"? It goes a bit deeper than that.

DeamonD wrote:

Bah I am not being an asshole.
But the fact that you claim that I know nothing while claiming that you know what you are talking about. In addition, you say that it is extremely hard to tell what is going on in peoples heads why you claim to manipulate them.
It does not work like that.
And I never said that you can tell what will happen 100%. I said that predicting a human mind is not "impossible" but NOT being able to predict it is improbable, especially for someone who has been around them a lot.

Also, I never made a claim that PLs lie only for attention, I said that they lie for it, but not ONLY for it or JUST for it.

Zebra wrote:

I've always said, I dissagree'd with you, not that my word is law, my friend. My mere reason, for my opinion is that I feel I'm speaking from experience, since I fit the definition to an extent. I also try to empathize with all side, which is why I'm arguing against a lot of what everyone is saying on here, because I feel they're getting the raw end of the deal.

Unfortunately, I feel it pointless, to argue to difficulty or severity of predicting others, due to an impossibly large amount of variables. As they say, people are usually pretty unique from eachother.

I'd much, rather not continue this arguement with you. I feel as though, we'd be getting off topic, trying to point out infallicies in eachother's words, rather than debating the behavior, actions, and motivations of PL's.