well are you truly undecided or are you denying his existence?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
run101 wrote:
all i can say is for those who don't believe God exists.... you better hope you're right
run101 wrote:
what are you basing your decision/opinion on? have you done any actual research yourself?
The post was edited 4 times, last by Nightfall ().
run101 wrote:
not a threat from me... but if you are wrong, i don't think God is going to just forgive you, or anyone, for denying his existence, which is why you better hope you're right since there is no going back
Big Bang - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Evidence for the Big Bang
Big Bang Theory
Above is the first sentence on the link to Wikipedia. Again... a theory cannot be fact, and therefore can't be evidence.The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model that explains the early development of the Universe,
Second paragraph of the 'Big Bang Evidence' link... Again... a theory cannot be fact, and therefore can't be evidence.Before beginning the examination of the evidence surrounding current cosmology, it is important to understand what Big Bang Theory (BBT) is and is not.
LuklaAdvocate wrote:
You can make the same argument in the inverse. Did the universe suddenly appear from nothing?
The post was edited 1 time, last by Laddergoat. ().
Laddergoat. wrote:
Well, considering I believe the big bang theory, the universe (to the naked eye) did suddenly appear from nothing...
KIA&SS, what about God? God is simply a theory cooked up by those who have nothing better to do than impose control on people. The Big Bang Theory is indeed a theory, but so is most of science, that's just how it works. You cannot simply say, WOAH MAN, THAT'S A THEORY, ITS WRONG.
KIA&SS wrote:
The third on the list is named a 'theory'. A theory by definition cannot be fact, and therefore can't be evidence.
Above is the first sentence on the link to Wikipedia. Again... a theory cannot be fact, and therefore can't be evidence.
Second paragraph of the 'Big Bang Evidence' link... Again... a theory cannot be fact, and therefore can't be evidence.
Definition of:the·o·ry
A proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Definition of: con·jec·ture
Guess; speculation.
You have given no evidence with these links. You have only established that your Big Bang is indeed nothing but a theory cooked up by people who have nothing better to do.
Nayr343 wrote:
Idk... This is can go on forever. Really think about it, if you are saying the was something before the big bang, then what created that? See how that can never be answered? Since we don't know for sure, we can only speculate.
Laddergoat. wrote:
Well, the end of a previous universe I assume. Its a perpetual cycle, the end of one, the beginning of another. Not instantly of course, but nothing happens quickly in that sense.
You're confusing the everyday concept of a theory with a scientific theory. In order for something to be a scientific theory, it must be well substantiated with evidence to back it up.KIA&SS wrote:
The third on the list is named a 'theory'.
You want to run that one by me again? A theory is made up of evidence. That's what theory means...to be substantiated by evidence.KIA&SS wrote:
A theory by definition cannot be fact, and therefore can't be evidence.
Again, you're confusing a scientific theory with the everyday usage of "theory."KIA&SS wrote:
Second paragraph of the 'Big Bang Evidence' link... Again... a theory cannot be fact , and therefore can't be evidence.
Definition of:the·o·ry
A proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
Definition of: con·jec·ture
Guess; speculation.
You have given no evidence with these links. You have only established that your Big Bang is indeed nothing but a theory cooked up by people who have nothing better to do.
Laddergoat. wrote:
Well, considering I believe the big bang theory, the universe (to the naked eye) did suddenly appear from nothing...
Laddergoat. wrote:
Well, the end of a previous universe I assume. Its a perpetual cycle, the end of one, the beginning of another. Not instantly of course, but nothing happens quickly in that sense.
realdrizzy13 wrote:
Believe what you want about god but If you use logical thinking it is pretty clear that he doesnt exist
Scientific Theory as defined by you:You're confusing the everyday concept of a theory with a scientific theory. In order for something to be a scientific theory, it must be well substantiated with evidence to back it up.
"Theory: In science, a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses."
Both have scientific base and assumption base. Both creation and the Big Bang can also be considered religious by nature.that's true; however, the Creationism theory is a theory too...... the Big Bang theory is scientifically based whereas the Creationism theory is religiously based
Nayr343 wrote:
If scientist can PROVE (no more theories scientists... Pls) that god doesn't exist then you atheist's can make that point. However you will not prove that for a LONG time (if ever).